Obtain the latest information on tax planning for property, buy to lets, working overseas, non-resident and offshore tax and much more - see site for more info now!Obtain the latest information on tax planning for property, buy to lets, working overseas, non-resident and offshore tax and much more - see site for more info now!
HomeInstant Tax AdviceUK Tax BlogSearchJoin TodayMember Area
Free Membership

Free Tax Books For All Members

 most popular
Our Tax Books
Ask A Tax Question
Latest Q&A's
Latest Articles
Tax Calculators
Search
Tax Coaching Club Area







home | Old Articles | How To Avoid CGT In 2012

Beneficial ownership, receiving a share of the proceeds and reducing CGT

When looking at the capital gains tax position on the disposal of property, the beneficial interest can have a significant impact.

CGT follows primarily the beneficial, as opposed to the legal interest. So the title holder is not necessarily the one subject to CGT on the disposal. Good examples of this are bare trustees and nominees.

So if you have a case where A, is the legal owner but holds the property as a nominee or bare trustee for B, on a disposal of the property it is B that is subject to CGT. Similarly there is no CGT charge on any transfer of the legal interest from A to B.

This, or at least variations on this, are very common. There are many instances where a property is held legally by one individual but actually occupied by another. In this case unless you can show that the occupier of the property actually held the beneficial interest, any capital gain on disposal would arise to the legal owner and would be subject to CGT.

By contrast if the occupier was subject to CGT they may well qualify for a CGT exemption under the principal private residence ('PPR') relief rules.

So determining the beneficial interest can be very important for CGT purposes. It has been held in various cases that if a spouse contributes directly or indirectly towards the initial cost, or towards mortgage instalments, he/she acquires, in equity, an interest in the matrimonial home proportional to those contributions even though the other spouse alone is registered as the legal owner.

In other cases the beneficial interest will depend on who has the 'rights and responsibilities of ownership'. This will include the responsibility for bills, ability to occupy it, ability to determine when it is sold, benefiting from the proceeds of sale etc.

If you wanted to argue that property was held as a nominee or bare trustee it is usually advisable to back all this up with a nominee agreement specifically stating who holds the beneficial interest in the property.

Proceeds of sale

One point that is worth noting is that just receiving a share of the proceeds of sale would not in itself mean that a share of the beneficial interest was held. It could be argued that this was just an allocation of the proceeds and providing the recipient had no other interest or rights over the property no beneficial entitlement could arise.

This could be useful if you have a situation where A wishes to purchase a property for B. The property will be occupied by B and A still wants to benefit from the future proceeds of sale.

By carefully structuring the agreement between A and B to show that A has no beneficial entitlement but can receive a share of the proceeds the gain would arise fully on B and as such would be exempt from CGT as his main residence.

Example

Jack bought a house in January 2001 for £50,000 and occupied it with his wife until January 2002, when they separated. He bought a new house for himself whilst she remained in the matrimonial home. They divorced in May 2004.

In August 2008 the Court ordered that Jill should be given 1/3 of the proceeds of sale of the matrimonial home. In January 2009 the house was sold for £180,000.

The gain accruing to Jack is computed as follows:
 
                                                   £
Disposal proceeds                180,000

Less Cost                             - 50,000

Net gain                               130,000

Jacks Private residence relief

Period of ownership:

January 2001 - January 2009 = 8 years

Period of only or main residence:

January 2001 - January 2002 = 1 year + last 3 years = 4 years PPR relief = 4/8 * £130,000 = £65,000

The chargeable gain is £65,000 before the annual exemption.

Jack is not entitled to a deduction for the £60,000 paid to Jill because this sum is an allocation of the proceeds and not a deduction in arriving at the gain.

Jill is not charged to Capital Gains Tax on the £60,000 she has received. It represents financial provision for her ordered by the Court and is not a sum received in consideration for the disposal of an asset.

So receiving the proceeds of sale is separate and distinct from the beneficial/equitable ownership and could be used in appropriate cases to minimise CGT on the disposal of assets.

The key issue is to ensure that the initial purchase is structured correctly with the beneficial ownership held by the individual subject to the lowest taxes eg the occupier for PPR relief purposes or an individual who will become non UK resident (eg to obtain the CGT exemption).




<< Previous | Next >>



·  PET and gift of AIM shares - USERNAME: wealth - 09/12/2013
·  Work in the UK for Statutory Residence Test - USERNAME: lhuggybear - 09/12/2013
·  Full vs insufficient income nomination for non doms - USERNAME: Fred - 09/12/2013
·  Tax treatment of payments on disposal of business - USERNAME: sam1 - 09/12/2013
·  Tax deduction for visa/work permit fees - USERNAME: Rob - 09/12/2013
·  Procedure for becoming resident but non UK domiciled - USERNAME: matt - 09/12/2013
·  CGT for non residents from April 2015 - USERNAME: DN - 06/12/2013
·  UK tax on US dividends - USERNAME: V V G - 06/12/2013
·  Dividends on class A and B shares - USERNAME: JamieS - 06/12/2013



FREE DOWNLOAD
Company Tax Planning Handbook 2015/2016
FREE DOWNLOAD - Tax Planning With Double Tax Treaties 2015+
FREE DOWNLOAD
Tax Planning With Double Tax Treaties 2015+


FREE DOWNLOAD
Buy To Let Tax Planning In 2015/2016

FREE DOWNLOAD
Tax Planning With Offshore Companies & Trusts 2015: The A-Z Guide
FREE DOWNLOAD - Tax Planning With Holding Companies: 2015+
FREE DOWNLOAD Tax Planning With Holding Companies: 2015+
FREE DOWNLOAD - Offshore Companies Holding UK Property: 2015+
FREE DOWNLOAD Offshore Companies Holding UK Property: 2015+
FREE DOWNLOAD - How To Avoid CGT In 2014/2015
FREE DOWNLOAD How To Avoid CGT In 2014/2015;
FREE DOWNLOAD - Royalty Tax Planning 2014: Strategies & Tactics To Reduce Tax
FREE DOWNLOAD - Royalty Tax Planning 2014: Strategies & Tactics To Reduce Tax
View MORE Tax Books +

Ask a tax question

6,005Tax Questions Answered

6,005 tax consultancy questions answered as at 1 January 2015 - Free for members


<b>Offshore Structuring To Reduce CGT</b>
How UK residents can use a Mauritian company to avoid UK capital gains taxHow UK residents can use a Mauritian company to avoid UK capital gains tax
Using overseas companies to avoid UK capital gains tax is an established form of tax planning. Unfortunately if you wanted to use this technique to avoid CGT nowadays it's subject to numerous anti avo . . . keep reading

Revealed - QC approved scheme to avoid CGT on the sale of UK investment property whilst UK resident/domiciledRevealed - QC approved scheme to avoid CGT on the sale of UK investment property whilst UK resident/domiciled
In this article, exclusively for our Practitioner members, we explore how UK residents and domiciliaries can use a Cyprus offshore structure to potentially avoid UK CGT completely on the disposal of U . . . keep reading



Latest Non-Residence Articles

 
Latest Non Domicile Articles

Latest Inheritance Tax Articles

Latest CGT Articles

Latest Offshore Tax Articles

 Discussion Forum
Recent Forum Posts - Practitioners Forum
• Should I use an LLP or Ltd Co?
• "UK Home" for Statutory Residence Test
• Entrepreneurs Relief on Foreign shares?
• Splitting a property into flats - reducing tax
• Mauritian company to avoid CGT
• BVI company for online trading?
• Best way to purchase UK property as a non resident?
• 30 day B&B rule
• share dealing by individual
• UK property owned by Jersey Company managed by UK company
Search Discussion

 PRESS COMMENTS
 AMAZON REVIEWS

Just what I needed all the information at my fingertips- 13, April, 2014

Everything you wanted to know about saving on your taxes- 24, May, 2014

Makes taxes seem almost sexy-almost! But very helpful and thats what counts- 29, May, 2014

All you need to know about capitals gains tax.....- 29, Jan, 2014

 TESTIMONIALS
Here's what our members are saying ...
"I joined the site after reading an offshore tax guide and was certainly not disappointed. The practical and 'to the point' tax planning has already saved me a considerable sum. I'd recommend this website to anyone."
Jerry Brown, Edinburgh


"From my experience, the advice offered by the team at WPR is second to none and compliments what is normally provided by a high street accountant and offers members quality analysis and advice on complicated tax situations both on and offshore.

I regularly receive a blank look and "I don't know about that" with regard to more imaginative questions and a visit to this site helps me move on. thank you."
Peter Jones, Germany


"I've saved £5,659 in CGT by using this site to double check my accountants advice. My wife has also identified further income tax savings of over £2,000 as result of the property tax articles. In our case it's well worth the £10 membership fee."
Derek Bailey, Birmingham


I must thank you for the most informative reply to my enquiry. It is so extensive, I intend setting an evening aside to absorb it all.

Again, thank you for a most useful website.
RB, UK


"Well written reports that are clear and insightful. I look forward to reading them every week!
Natasha Foude, France


"I have to say your web site is by far the best prepared and most informative that I have seen."
Elsa Budding, Newcastle


"I'm planning my emigration and the offshore reports are exactly what I'm looking for. I'll definitely be renewing!"
Sarah Mather, Reigate, Surrey.


"The property tax advice service was excellent, and I'd have no problems recommending it to anyone. I received my answer within 1 day and was very pleased with the response
Robert Saunders, Leicester